Posts Tagged ‘brain-training’

Brain Fitness Pro Review in Movie Entertainment Magazine

Friday, February 20th, 2009

The technology columnist for the Globe and Mail – Jack Kapica – wrote up several brain fitness programs for Canadian publication Movie Entertainment Magazine (why? not sure); one of which was Brain Fitness Pro:

“Mind Sparke’s Brain Fitness Pro, graphically spartan, is based on serious research by scientists who claim that progressive training of working memory increases intelligence by more than 40 per cent. You can reach that goal in 20 days, they say, by playing this austere PC game 30 minutes a day. It pushes the player to remember and process visual and auditory information under time pressure.”

Brain Training 101 – Erin’s Review With Post IQ Test Increase

Monday, February 9th, 2009

Having completed her 19 days of training last week, Erin took the GIQTest on Saturday. You can read her final assessment of Brain Fitness Pro here: “How I Improved My Productivity, Strengthened My Working Memory And Increased My IQ Score By 12 Points In 19 Days

Working-Memory Training Report – Shaun – Session 50

Monday, January 26th, 2009

Session number: 50!!

Average n-back: 5.05

Duration (min.): 30

Session 04 on Fr28Nov average of 2.3
Session 05 on Sa29Nov average of 2.4
Session 06 on Su30Nov average of 2.95
Session 07 on Tu02Dec average of 2.75
Session 08 on Th04Dec average of 3.35
Session 09 on Fr05Dec average of 3.4
Session 10 on Sa06Dec average of 3.65
Session 11 on Su07Dec average of 3.7
Session 12 on Mo08Dec average of 3.8
Session 13 on Tu09Dec average of 4.25
Session 14 on We10Dec average of 4.1
Session 15 on Th11Dec average of 4.4
Session 16 on Fr12Dec average of 4.5
Session 17 on Su14Dec average of 4.2
Session 18 on Mo15Dec average of 4.3
Session 19 on Tu16Dec average of 4.55
Session 20 on Th18Dec average of 4.3
Session 21 on Fr19Dec average of 4.45
Session 22 on Sa20Dec average of 4.5
Session 23 on Su21Dec average of 4.65
Session 24 on Mo22Dec average of 4.8
Session 25 on Tu23Dec average of 4.4
Session 26 on We24Dec average of 4.85
Session 27 on Tu30Dec average of 4.4
Session 28 on Mo05Jan average of 4.55
Session 29 on Tu06Jan average of 4.85
Session 30 on We07Jan average of 4.9
Session 31 on Th08Jan average of 5.1
Session 32 on Fr09Jan average of 4.9
Session 33 on Sa10Jan average of 5.05
Session 34 on Su11Jan average of 5.25
Session 35 on Tu13Jan average of 5
Session 36 on Th15Jan average of 4.9
Session 37 on Fr16Jan average of 5.25
Session 38 on Sa17Jan average of 4.6
Session 39 on Sa17Jan average of 5.35
Session 40 on Su18Jan average of 4.75
Session 41 on Mo19Jan average of 4.9
Session 42 on Mo19Jan average of 5.5
Session 43 on Tu20Jan average of 5.15
Session 44 on We21Jan average of 5.2
Session 45 on Th22Jan average of 4.85
Session 46 on Fr23Jan average of 5
Session 47 on Sa24Jan average of 4.65
Session 48 on Sa24Jan average of 5.05
Session 49 on Su25Jan average of ?
Session 50 on Su25Jan average of 5.05

I wanted to do fifty training sessions, and I did it!

I learned that my score on an n-back task can increase from 2.30 (or so) to 5.0 (or so) with about fifty training sessions.

Based on my experience, the next step is that I am going to take five days to consolidate the gains, then on day six (Sat-31-Jan, within reason) carry out two or three on-line IQ tests, and after that make another decision.

The BFPro Training has been personally rewarding. Warm regards,

Shaun.

Brain Fitness Pro working-memory training report.

This post was submitted by Shaun Luttin.

Fluid Intelligence And IQ

Wednesday, January 14th, 2009

I had a rightfully skeptical question from a customer about whether, as a person long since identified as gifted, he would see any noticeable gains from working-memory training. He also pointed out that the measured gains in fluid intelligence of 40% and more could not possibly translate into the same percentage gains for IQ, particularly for someone with a high IQ. Quite right. Here is an abbreviated version of my answer:

“The BFP training blog enjoys frequent contributions from those with measured IQ scores at or above the MENSA level. They’ve obtained benefits from the training that have kept them training well beyond 19 days. One BFP customer increased his IQ score by more than 15%, gaining entry to MENSA, after training for two 19 day periods.

“Specifically, as you correctly point out, an increase in fluid intelligence of 40% does not translate into an increase in general IQ of 40%. General IQ has to do with several factors, not just fluid intelligence. To the best of our knowledge, smart people tend to see gains in IQ of 10 to 20%, but we don’t have enough data yet to generalize and define this increase more precisely. But quite apart from raw scores, the BFP working-memory training produces beautiful, noticeable changes in one’s life. It can enhance any experience that places demands on working-memory, fluid intelligence, concentration and multi-tasking, such as playing a musical instrument, writing a paper, or operating smoothly in a complex social situation.”

Brain Fitness And City Life

Thursday, January 8th, 2009

I like living in a big city. I grew up in a small town and as soon as I graduated I moved to London. I just couldn’t imagine living anywhere else (in England). I later lived in Milan, Chicago, and now New York. But I’ve always thought that considering the continuum of human evolution, cities were unnatural and mentally unhealthy places to live. We’re not yet evolved to effectively cope with the demands and stresses of the big city.

This is the subject of an article in the Boston Globe which focuses on the mentally challenging aspects of city life and the restorative values of even small patches of nature.

I long ago moved out of Manhattan, preferring the relative bucollery of the outer boroughs. And I enjoy taking my run around the local park. So, this all seems subjectively sensible to me.

Interestingly for readers of this blog, the article mentions that working-memory has been found to be diminished even by walking down a city street. So, if you live in a city, training your working-memory would seem to be a good strategy for coping!

Working-Memory Limits in Modern Life

Monday, December 15th, 2008

The Wall Street Journal ran a piece today focusing on task overload and information overload of modern life. Torkel Klingberg has written a book called “The Overflowing Brain” in which he describes how life today gives our brains too much to think about. Our lives and the technologies we use have evolved more quickly than we have. (This is something I think about often.)

In revealing the problems of multi-tasking, Klingberg hones in on the limited capacity of working-memory. When we switch between tasks we quickly overload our working-memory.

Klingberg also points out that we can only be truly attentive to one task at once.

I’m writing about this because while I believe in simplifying our lives and reducing the information clutter, we cannot eliminate complexity entirely. That’s where Brain Fitness Pro comes in. It is specifically designed to increase working-memory capacity and multi-tasking capability with an exercise that demands concentration and focus. This accounts for some of the experiences that customers have reported describing better overall attention and ability to get tasks done.

Brain Plasticity: Learning to Rethink Drugs

Saturday, December 13th, 2008

An article in MIT’s Technology Review “Making an Old Brain Young: Scientists are developing new ways to manipulate the brain’s normal plasticity” caught my eye this week. From the title I thought this would be a serious review of the medical advances expected from therapies that leverage brain plasticity.

Unfortunately, the article focused entirely on the possibility for developing drugs that exploit plasticity.

I’m not against drugs. Drugs are amazing. One very immediate example in my life: My daughter has congenital hypothyroidism — without synthetic thyroid hormone she would have been severely disabled. The medical world should be evaluating drugs that leverage plasticity. What concerned me about the article was the lack of any mention of reference to non-drug therapies. At the moment such therapies seem to be appearing or surfacing thick and fast and can be used right now, without waiting for the drugs to be developed, tested and approved: The Australian Alzheimer’s Association has endorsed brain training exercises as a non-pharmacalogical mechanism for delaying or preventing the onset of Alzheimer’s symptoms. The most effective therapies for stroke victims leverage plasticity through non-drug therapies (see Drake and Taub). Many learning specialists now work with brain exercises to mitigate or correct learning dysfunctions rather than accommodations. And other research has shown that the generation of new nerve cells in the dentate gyrus helps combat depression — something that can be assisted with exercise and brain exercise…

Surely, if our newfound knowledge of plasticity teaches us anything it teaches us that non-drug therapies can achieve some remarkable results.

Just beginning…

Saturday, December 13th, 2008

I just finished my second session and wanted to join in the group. I improved slightly from 2.2 -2.3.

Looking forward to tomorrow!

Doidge – Part 3 – The Science of Brain Training

Friday, November 21st, 2008
Norman Doidge: The Brain That Changes Itself

Norman Doidge: The Brain That Changes Itself

(This post is adapted from an entry on our sister blog at mindevolvesoftware.com)

In Chapter three of his book, Doidge focuses on the remarkable career and contributions to the understanding of brain science of Michael Merzenich , a scientist driven by the desire to solve real world problems (like understanding autism) and not content to leave the solutions to others. With Merzenich, a practical solution is part of the scientific challenge.

This section of the book is a must-read for anyone interested in the science behind brain plasticity, brain training, learning and learning dysfunctions, autism, and brain aging. But I will highlight some of the particularly luminous thoughts:

Merzenich: The brain is “like a living creature with an appetite” what we feed it to some extent determines how it thrives. When we engage our brains it matters what we do with them.

Shifting brain maps: By microscopic mapping of the surface of the brain, Merzenich showed that the areas of the brain controlling and responding to things like touch shifted over time depending upon what the brain needed to do with them. (Use two fingers together all the time, the brain maps for those two fingers become merged.)

Competitive plasticity: The brain is constantly assessing how important it is to allocate space to certain skills and functions. The more we demand of a certain skill (like playing the piano) the more space and brain power it gets. The less we use a certain function or skill, the more it loses its brain real estate to other functions.

The role of close attention in plastic change: Merzenich found that repetition alone isn’t enough for plastic change. When monkeys in his research performed tasks repeatedly their brain maps changed, but only if they paid close attention to the task did the changes hold long term. (This is a underpinning tenet to the Brain Fitness Pro training exercise and crops up on the training blog all the time.)

Why children learn so easily… and why adults don’t. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor or BDNF plays a critical role in triggering the brain’s ability to absorb and learn. In children during the critical period of learning the child’s body releases a lot of BDNF, keeping the brain constantly stimulated to absorb new information. Children’s brains are engaged and absorbent throughout this period. But at the end of the critical period, the body releases a whole lot more BDNF, a trigger that effectively shuts down the critical period and puts an end to this process.

It may seem odd that we’re designed to stop learning effortlessly past a certain point, but it would be difficult to function as an adult if we were constantly distracted and unable to determine priorities and accumulate the wisdom of trial and error.

Restimulating plasticity in adults: As Doidge puts it, “We rarely engage in tasks in which we must focus our attention as closely as we did when we were younger.” Merzenich found that the brain’s ability to grow new nerve cells, forge plastic change, and learn new skills wasn’t completely shut off in adults, but required certain conditions to be opened up again. The first condition is highly focused attention. The second is reward or satisfaction, which can come from novelty, pleasure, or a sense of achievement. (Again, these are foundations of the Brain Fitness Pro design.)

In Merzenich’s own words: “Everything that you can see happen in a young brain can happen in an older brain.”

This phase of Merzenich’s career lead him to help found Posit Science, a company that publishes brain training software to help children with learning disabilities and to provide brain training for older people who are losing or don’t want to lose memory function or mental sharpness as they age.

(As I’ve written elsewhere, Posit Science seems to have great products, but they’re unfortunately very expensive, and prohibitively expensive in many situations that could really help people. A full program for an adult costs over $600. That’s why I believe that Brain Fitness Pro should remain affordable, in order to bring these kinds of benefits to those who need them but just don’t have hundreds of dollars to spend.)

Related posts:

Building a Better Brain — in the second case study Doidge focuses on Barbara Arrowsmith Young’s discovery that learning disabilities can be mitigated by training the weaker areas of the brain to be stronger.

Part 2 – Rewiring balance — Doidge explores the incredible contributions of Michael Merzenich (the founder of Posit Science).

Suggestions For Mastering The Visual Sequence

Saturday, October 25th, 2008

A Brain Fitness Pro user asked for tips on improving success on the visual sequences. This was what I had:

I find that I do better on the visual when I think of it as a pattern or flow of positions. Instead of trying to remember “upper-right, bottom-middle, etc.” I instead try to hold a picture of the flow of white squares in my mind’s eye…”

Anyone else have a tip?